2003-2005
Buying now won 94% to 100% of the tests.
Prices were rising quickly enough that two additional years of savings often failed to catch the moving target.
Buyer Strategy
Twenty-three years of housing data says waiting two years sometimes worked beautifully. More often, it made the eventual purchase more expensive.
The Study
A&D Mortgage compared two choices across all 50 states and the District of Columbia: buy in a given year or wait two years. The study used historical home values, 30-year mortgage rates, and median household income from 2000 through 2022.
The buyer in each scenario put 15% down. The household that waited saved an additional 10% of median income in each of the two years. The lower purchase and financing cost won.
Buying immediately produced the better result in 61% of the state-year comparisons. California's buy-now share was 74%, tied with Florida for the highest result reported. West Virginia was at the other end of the table at 39%.
The market offered plenty of good years to wait. It simply did not announce them in advance.
2003-2005
Prices were rising quickly enough that two additional years of savings often failed to catch the moving target.
2007-2010
The housing correction made patience unusually valuable. This is the report's strongest reminder that timing can matter a great deal.
2020-2022
Rapid appreciation overwhelmed the benefit of waiting in the study's modeled comparisons.
The Rate Question
The study's 2013 comparison is instructive. The average 30-year rate eased from 3.98% in 2013 to 3.85% in 2015, yet buying in 2013 won in 84% of state scenarios. The small rate improvement did not make up for what happened to prices.
The reverse also occurred. Rates fell from 8.05% in 2000 to 6.54% in 2002, and buying in 2000 won only 34% of the comparisons. Waiting was useful when the financing improvement was large enough and local prices were cooperative.
Freddie Mac's latest national average is 6.76% for a 30-year fixed mortgage, up from 6.35% one year ago. On an $800,000 loan, principal and interest at 6.76% is about $5,194 per month. At 6.00%, the same loan would be about $4,796. That $398 difference matters, but the future price of the same property matters too.
Los Angeles Context
The seasonally adjusted S&P Cotality Case-Shiller Los Angeles index reached 445.16 in June 2026, compared with 247.52 in June 2016. That is an increase of about 80% over ten years. Because the index is set to 100 in January 2000, the latest reading is roughly 345% above that starting level.
Case-Shiller follows repeat sales, which makes it useful for tracking price movement. It does not measure a buyer's payment, cash reserves, insurance, taxes, or whether a particular house was worth buying. It also records the correction that made waiting from 2007 through 2010 so effective in A&D's study.
Recent appreciation is much slower than the decade-long Los Angeles figure suggests. FHFA reported U.S. prices up 2.1% year over year in the second quarter of 2026 and 0.3% from the prior quarter. Buyers are facing high prices and high financing costs, but not one uniform national market.
What The Study Leaves Out
The waiting household saves part of its income, but the model does not include rent paid while waiting or returns earned on the down payment and additional savings.
Property taxes, insurance, maintenance, homeowners association dues, and tax effects are excluded. Those costs are material in Los Angeles and can change the comparison.
The study compares acquisition and financing cost. It does not credit the earlier buyer with principal reduction or subsequent appreciation, and it does not model selling costs.
A favorable forecast is useful. A durable payment and enough time are useful every month.
The Practical Read
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau notes that closing costs typically run 2% to 5% of the purchase price, before the down payment. It also advises buyers to expect taxes, insurance, utilities, repairs, and maintenance, and to stay long enough for the cost of buying and selling to make sense.
In Los Angeles, buying is most defensible when the payment works at today's rate, the reserves survive closing, the property fits for several years, and the buyer would still be comfortable if prices paused. A future refinance can improve a sound purchase. It should not be required to rescue one.
Waiting can be the better decision when income is uncertain, cash is thin, the likely holding period is short, or renting offers materially better flexibility. The historical data does not eliminate that choice. It puts a price on assuming that a better market will arrive on schedule.
Source note: this page is original commentary based on A&D Mortgage's 2026 report, S&P Cotality Case-Shiller Los Angeles data published by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Freddie Mac's Primary Mortgage Market Survey, the Federal Housing Finance Agency House Price Index, and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau home-buying guidance. The A&D study describes comparisons from 2000 through 2022 and does not publish its complete calculation workbook. Its table includes 2022 as a starting year for a two-year comparison, so readers should review the stated methodology and source dates carefully. The $800,000 payment examples are illustrative principal-and-interest calculations and omit taxes, insurance, fees, and other costs. Information and figures are subject to errors and omissions; readers should independently review and verify all data and property-specific information.
View the A&D Mortgage reportBuyer Guidance
LA Creative Realty can compare the payment, recent sales, likely holding period, and property condition before you make a move.